LISIS/Club déstabilisation
Objectif
modifierNourrir une culture commune au LISIS sur la question de déstabilisation, à travers de la lecture commune de références essentielles et de la discussion de travaux du groupe par rapport à la question.
Programmation
modifierA discuter et valider
Modalité d'animation
modifierProposition : les doctorants commentent les textes proposés. Le commentateur d'un texte prépare un ou deux paragraphes sur le contenu, la pertinence et les propositions du texte.
Séances
modifierTrois séances sur 2022–2023 à définir
Textes
modifier| Référence complète | Proposé par | Motivation | Commentaires (signez avec votre prénom) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tarrow, Sidney G. 2005. The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press. | ? | ? | Quelle pertinence ? - Bruno |
| Schurman, Rachel, (2004). Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe. Social Problems, 51(2), 243–268. doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.243 | ? | ? | |
| Walker, Edward T., Andrew W. Martin, and John D. McCarthy. “Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires.” American Journal of Sociology 114, no. 1 (2008): 35–76. | ? | ? | |
| McCormick, Sabrina. Democratizing Science Movements: A New Framework for Contestation. Social Studies of Science 37: 609-623. | ? | ? | |
| Taylor, V. and Crossley, A.D. (2013). Abeyance. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (eds D.A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans and D. McAdam). | ? | Taylor’s concept of Abeyance in Social movements (part of the ideas of political process models (and protest cycles) of Douglas McAdam and Charles Tilly) – which offers an understanding of movement decline, failure and demobilization. | |
| Hipsher, Patricia L. “Democratization and the Decline of Urban Social Movements in Chile and Spain.” Comparative Politics 28, no. 3 (1996): 273–97. | ? | ? | |
| Kuokkanen A., A. Nurmi, M. Mikkilä, M. Kuisma, H. Kahiluoto, L. Linnanen, Agency in regime destabilization through the selection environment: The Finnish food system’s sustainability transition, Research Policy, Volume 47, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 1513-1522, ISSN 0048-7333. | ? | ? | |
| van Oers, Feola, Moors, Runhaar (2021). The politics of desliberate destabilisation for sustainability transitions. | Linda Widdel | ? | |
| Feola, Giuseppe, Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn?, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Volume 35, 2020, Pages 241-250, ISSN 2210-4224 | Allison Marie Loconto | ? | |
| Pansera M, Fressoli M. Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era. Organization. 2021;28(3):380-404. | Allison Marie Loconto | ? | Quelle pertinence déstabilisation? - Bruno |
| Mol, Spaargaren, Sonnenfeld. Ecological modernization theory: taking stock, moving forward. 2013. | Allison Marie Loconto | ? | Texte important pour GTI, mais quelle pertinence déstabilisation? - Bruno |
| Mol, A.P.J., Sonnenfeld, D.A., & Spaargaren, G. (2009). The Ecological Modernisation Reader: Environmental reform in theory and practice (1st ed.). Routledge. | Allison Marie Loconto | ? | Texte important pour GTI, mais quelle pertinence déstabilisation? - Bruno |
| Arthur, W.B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 99, 116–131. | Bruno | ||
| Bergek, A., Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., Hobday, M., 2013. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Research Policy 42, 1210–1224. | Bruno | ||
| Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., Sushandoyo, D., 2015. Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry. Research Policy 44, 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.009 | Bruno | ||
| Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Trippl, M., 2020. The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies 28, 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466 | Bruno | ||
| Elliott, R., 2018. The sociology of climate change as a sociology of loss. Archives Europeennes de Sociologie 59, 301–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975618000152 | Bruno | ||
| Geels, F.W., 2014. Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society 31, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627 | Bruno | ||
| Goulet, F., Vinck, D., 2017. Moving towards innovation through withdrawal: The neglect of destruction, in: Godin, B., Vinck, D. (Eds.), Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias. Edward Elgar, pp. 97–114. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367229.00014 | Bruno | ||
| Hambrick, D.C., D’Aveni, R.A., 1988. Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 1–23. | Bruno | ||
| Hassink, R., 2010. Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography 450–470. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806497.00031 | Bruno | ||
| Heyen, D.A., Hermwille, L., Wehnert, T., 2017. Out of the Comfort Zone! Governing the Exnovation of Unsustainable Technologies and Practices Innovations. GAIA 26, 326–331. | Bruno | ||
| Hoffmann, S., Weyer, J., Longen, J., 2017. Discontinuation of the automobility regime? An integrated approach to multi-level governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 103, 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.016 | Bruno | ||
| Isoaho, K., Markard, J., 2020. The Politics of Technology Decline: Discursive Struggles over Coal Phase-Out in the UK. Review of Policy Research 37, 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12370 | Bruno | ||
| Johnstone, P., Hielscher, S., 2017. Phasing out coal, sustaining coal communities? Living with technological decline in sustainability pathways. Extractive Industries and Society 4, 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.06.002 | Bruno | ||
| Johnstone, P., Stirling, A., Sovacool, B., 2017. Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 33, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.005 | Bruno | ||
| Joly, P.-B., Barbier, M., Turnheim, B., 2022. Gouverner l’arrêt des grands systèmes sociotechniques, In: Goulet, F., Vinck, D. (Eds.), Faire sans, faire avec moins, Les nouveaux horizons de l’innovation, Paris, Presses des Mines, Collection Sciences sociales, 35-49. | Bruno | ||
| Kivimaa, P., Kern, F., 2016. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 45, 205–217. | Bruno | ||
| Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., Wessberg, N., 2015. The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.005 | Bruno | ||
| Kungl, G., 2015. Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition. Energy Research and Social Science 8, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.009 | Bruno | ||
| Langhelle, O., Meadowcroft, J., Rosenbloom, D., 2019. Politics and technology: Deploying the state to accelerate socio-technical transitions for sustainability, in: Meadowcroft, J., Banister, D., Holden, E., Langhelle, O., Linnerud, K. (Eds.), What Next for Sustainable Development?: Our Common Future at Thirty. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 239–259. | Bruno | ||
| Mahoney, J., 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29, 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879 | Bruno | ||
| Martínez Arranz, A., 2017. Lessons from the past for sustainability transitions? A meta-analysis of socio-technical studies. Global Environmental Change 44, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.007 | Bruno | ||
| Newig, J., Derwort, P., Jager, N.W., 2019. Sustainability through institutional failure and decline? Archetypes of productive pathways. Ecology and Society 24, 18–31. | Bruno | ||
| Normann, H.E., 2019. Conditions for the deliberate destabilisation of established industries: Lessons from U.S. tobacco control policy and the closure of Dutch coal mines. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 33, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.03.007 | Bruno | ||
| Ottosson, M., Magnusson, T., 2013. Socio-technical regimes and heterogeneous capabilities: The Swedish pulp and paper industry’s response to energy policies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 25, 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.774349 | Bruno | ||
| Phelps, N.A., Atienza, M., Arias, M., 2018. An invitation to the dark side of economic geography. Environment and Planning A 50, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17739007 | Bruno | ||
| Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing Returns , Path Dependence , and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review 94, 251–267. | Bruno | ||
| Rodríguez-Pose, A., 2018. Commentary: The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11, 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024 | Bruno | ||
| Rogge, K.S., Johnstone, P., 2017. Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: The case of the German Energiewende. Energy Research and Social Science 33, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.004 | Bruno | ||
| Seto, K.C., Davis, S.J., Mitchell, R., Stokes, E.C., Unruh, G., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., 2016. Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 | Bruno | ||
| Shove, E., 2012. The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 24, 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663961 | Bruno | ||
| Sillak, S., Kanger, L., 2020. Global pressures vs. local embeddedness: the de- and restabilization of the Estonian oil shale industry in response to climate change (1995–2016). Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.003 | Bruno | ||
| Smink, M.M., Hekkert, M.P., Negro, S.O., 2015. Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 24, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1808 | Bruno | ||
| Steen, M., Weaver, T., 2017. Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Research Policy 46, 1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.001 | Bruno | ||
| Stegmaier, P., Kuhlmann, S., Visser, V.R., others, 2014. The discontinuation of socio-technical systems as a governance problem, in: Edler, J., Borrás, S. (Eds.), The Governance of Systems Change: Explaining Change. pp. 111–131. | Bruno | ||
| Stirling, A., 2019. How deep is incumbency ? A ‘configuring fields’ approach to redistributing and reorienting power in socio-material change. Energy Research & Social Science 58, 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101239 | Bruno | ||
| Strangleman, T., 2017. Deindustrialisation and the Historical Sociological Imagination: Making Sense of Work and Industrial Change. Sociology 51, 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515622906 | Bruno | ||
| Streeck, W., Thelen, K. (Eds.), 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford. | Bruno | ||
| Suarez, F.F., Oliva, R., 2005. Environmental change and organizational transformation. Industrial and Corporate Change 14, 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth078 | Bruno | ||
| Turnheim, B., Geels, F.W., 2013. The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913-1967). Research Policy 42, 1749–1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.009 | Bruno | ||
| Tushman, M.L., Anderson, P., 1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 439–465. | Bruno | ||
| Unruh, G.C., 2002. Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2 | Bruno | ||
Sous-thématiques
modifierA définira
Invitations
modifierA définir
Discussions autour du travail empirique d'un.e membre du groupe
modifierA définir
Ateliers 2022
modifier16 mai (14h-16h)
modifierCompte rendu de la séance
Lectures « socle commun »
modifierRosenbloom and Rinscheid (2020) proposent une revue (non sans biais) de ‘deliberate decline’, plus 2 textes importants pour les études de transitions, pour y retrouver la trace de la thématique ‘destabilisation’ : Köhler et al (2019), qui dresse l’agenda de recherche (plus ou moins consensuel) des études de transitions; et Geels and Schot (2007), qui avancent la notion de ‘chemin de transition’ (transitions pathways).
Köhler et al (2019), commenté par Marc
modifierCe texte dit plein de trucs. Il est pertinent à la thématique pour des raisons. Il propose telle et telle choses.
Geels and Schot (2007), commenté par Marc
modifierCe texte dit plein de trucs. Il est pertinent à la thématique pour des raisons. Il propose telle et telle choses.
Rosenbloom and Rinscheid (2020), commenté par Bruno
modifierCe texte propose une revue des travaux sur 'deliberate decline' dans le contexte des enjeux de décarbonisation. Les auteurs mobilisent des réseaux de publications scientifiques pour tenter de faire la cartographie et la génealogie de la production scientifique sur les sujets. Leur objectif est donc de 'faire voir' la diversité des thématiques et écoles de pensée disponibles, mais aussi de dessiner des pistes de recherche.
Méthodologiquement, le papier est intéressant car il s'inspire des approches scientométriques (réseaux de publication). Les auteurs proposent d'explorer 3 'concepts' distincts (phase-out, divestment, destabilization), sélectionnés de manière assez ad hoc selon leur pertinence à la thématique (décarbonisation) et leurs contributions aux questions de politique publique et de pratique. Les auteurs utilisent les 3 requêtes suivantes sur Scopus (voir tableau ci-dessous). Néanmoins, l'approche proposée est assez problématique car les choix sont assez arbitraires, diffèrent d'un corpus à l'autre. Par exemple, le périmètre de 'destabilization' est défini par rapport à un champ d'étude ('transitions studies', ciblé via la mobilisation de références de 3 auteurs importants du champs), alors que les autres corpus sont délimités purement par la combinaison d'un terme cible et de deux termes visant à cibler le contexte thématique. Par conséquent, les résultats sont peu crédibles. Ils permettent d'identifier des thématiques pertinentes, mais pas du tout de manière systématique.
| Concept cible | Requête Scopus | Résultats |
|---|---|---|
| phase-out | TITLE-ABS-KEY (phaseout OR phase-out
AND ban* OR government OR policy OR subsid* AND “climate change”) |
106 |
| divestment | TITLE-ABS-KEY (divestment)
AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“fossil fuel”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“climate change”) |
44 |
| destabilization | TITLE-ABS-KEY (“destabilization”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“"destabilisation")
AND REF (geels) OR REF (hekkert) OR REF (loorbach) |
41 |
Par ailleurs, les auteurs explorent le croisement de ces littératures, ils identifient des liens entre phase-out et destabilization, mais quasiment aucun entre ces deux et divestment.
Ce texte est pertinent car il propose de dresser les contours des études de déclin dans un contexte de gouvernance climatique, mais qu'il le fait avec beaucoup de restrictions. il pourra donc inspirer des démarches d'exploration et de questionnement plus large des travaux pertinents sur la déstabilisation, le décline, le retrait.
Discussion
modifierOn devrait lister de façon sommaire les points importants de discussion.
Etc
modifier- programme (quels textes lire, qui inviter le cas échéant, quelles sous-thématiques et littératures explorer)
- modalités d’animation (qui discute des textes, comment)
- les modalités de documentation (Ale a proposé un Wiki comme registre sur lequel on pourrait faire une synthèse des textes et des discussions)
- les envies de chacun (par exemple certains ont souligné l’importance d’une exploration empirique et pas que théorique)